On Facebook I made the suggestion to apply a profound TRIZ analysis to the Corona problem as a challenge full of contraditions to transform the harmful into useful (or - at least - less harmful). I started a separate Corona Thread to record the most useful proposals.
May be it is also worth to collect links about TRIZ in Business? I just started such a collection beginning with Facebook posts.
Valeri Souchkov about TRIZ and Money. Почему ТРИЗ-команды не запускают свои продукты? (Why TRIZ teams don’t sell their products?)
Sergey Simakov started another discussion about the basics of TRIZ.
There is a continuation of the discussion on the problem “What’s the Relation of Man to its Technical Systems?”. I had a close look into the “MATRIZ approved material” about TESE, the “Trends of Engineering Systems Evolution” and also Nikolay Shpakovsky’s Book “Tree of Technological Evolution”. More is available in a separate TSN Thread.
On the TRIZ Facebook channel a reminder to a 2003 paper on application of TRIZ principles within the SARS epidemy published in the TRIZ Journal was posted showing that using TRIZ principles is widespread, even if unconscious.
Valeri Souchkov about the role of ideas for solutions in complex challenges in a post on his Facebook channel.
Антон Кожемяко: интервью про ТРИЗ [мифы, возможности, тренды] (Anton Kozhemyako: interview about TRIZ [myths, opportunities, trends])
The relationship between TRIZ and philosophical questions, in particular those related to Hegel’s dialectic and thus also to the fundamental epistemic assumptions of Marx and Engels, is undisputed, see for example the work of Justus Schollmeyer. In his work, Anton Kozhemyako refers strongly to philosophical theory buildings, which were designed within the school of the Russian philosopher G.P. Schtschedrovitsky. Mikhail Rubin criticized this reference in his expert opinion of Kozhemyako’s work as unsustainable mainly due to terminology inconsistencies. That remains to be explored.
Московский ТРИЗ Клуб. «Марксизм между будущим и прошлым» (Moscow TRIZ Club. “Marxism between the future and the past”)
The videos (in Russian):
I started a discussion about the problem “What’s the Relation of Man to its Technical Systems?”. The starting point came from the Development Laws of Technical Systems that play an important role in TRIZ theory, but are shaped in a different manner within different TRIZ schools.
The discussion was started in the TRIZ facebook group a consolidated version of the discussion both in German and Russian is available in a separate TSN Thread. Meanwhile additional remarks and links were added.
There was a discussion about TRIZ and the notions of component, system and function on Sergey Simakov’s Facebook channel. Some of the material is recorded and planned to be translated in English in a separate TSN Thread.
Natalya Rubina published the material for the TRIZ Cup 2020.
A version with English and German Translation is on the way and will be available in the directory TRIZCup/2020 of the OpenDiscovery WUMM subproject.
Valeri Souchkov published a new newsletter.
The TRIZ Journal published my TRIZ Newbee’s Report.
There was a discussion about the differences between TRIZ and Design Thinking on Valeri Souchkov’s Facebook channel. Some of the material is recorded and translated in English in a separate TSN Thread.
Valeri Souchkov published a youtube video with a presentation (in Russian) “Прорывное мышление в малом и среднем бизнес. ТРИЗ для предпринимателей” (Breakthrough thinking in small and medium-sized businesses. TRIZ for business) that initiated a strong discussion at his Facebook channel.
Дмитрий Бахтурин представил визионерскую лекцию В.А.Подороги – «Общее чувство. Естественные границы искусственного». (Dmitry Bakhturin introduced the visionary lecture of V.A. Podorogi – “General feeling. The natural boundaries of the artificial”.)
In Hamburg we had a meeting about TRIZ, dialectics and the development of the GDR Inventor Schools with Rainer Thiel, Justus Schollmeyer, Kai Hiltmann and others.